Skip to main content

3 months of sumof: the numbers nobody asked for

apr 11, 2026 — may 10, 2026

impressions: 213 (last month: 245)
product page views: 23 (last month: 18)
downloads: 0 (last month: 1)
revenue: US$0 (last month: 4.24)
active devices: not enough data (last month: not enough data)
deletions: not enough data (last month: not enough data)


may 11, 2026 — jun 9, 2026

impressions: 256 (last month: 213)
product page views: 25 (last month: 23)
downloads: 1 (last month: 0)
revenue: US$4.63 (last month: 0)
active devices: not enough data (last month: not enough data)
deletions: not enough data (last month: not enough data)


my best guess

I skipped last month because downloads were zero. This month had one download, so I am writing the check-in.

The page views are still small: 23 last month, 25 this month. I was not sure how much of that was because Sumof is still a new app, how much was an App Store optimization problem, and how much was just the reality of a paid app, so I asked Codex to look at it.

Codex's answer was roughly this.

The app being new probably matters, because the total number of impressions is still small. But the app is not invisible. It had 213 impressions last month and 256 this month, so the problem may be closer to "some people see it, but not many people click" than "nobody sees it at all."

Keywords, subtitle, app name, and the keyword field are probably more connected to impressions than page views. If those are weak, the app may show up less often or show up for the wrong searches. In that case, the low number of page views may start from the low number of impressions.

According to Codex, the page-view rate itself does not look obviously bad. 23 page views from 213 impressions is about 10.8%. 25 from 256 is about 9.8%. Compared with last time's search and browse numbers, that does not look especially low.

Being a paid app may also matter, since the price is visible before download.

So my current guess is: impressions are probably the bigger problem, and the App Store page is where I can work on that first. Better keywords and a clearer subtitle might help more of the right people find Sumof. Better screenshots and product-page text might make the use case clearer for the people who already tap.


next month's delusions

More input does not guarantee more revenue. Even if revenue doubled from here, it would not change my life in any meaningful way. So for now, spending more development time on adding features does not feel like the right next move. The better use of time is probably App Store optimization.

The subtitle, description, keywords, and screenshots all need another pass. The point is simple: increase impressions, and give people more reason to download. I do not know if I can do that well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

3 months of requote: the numbers nobody asked for

nov 5, 2025 — dec 4, 2025 impressions: 729 product page views: 68 downloads: 6 in-app purchases: 0 revenue: US$0 active devices: 2 deletions: 1 dec 5, 2025 — jan 3, 2026 impressions: 1,491 product page views: 53 downloads: 4 in-app purchases: 1 revenue: US$0 active devices: 1 deletions: 1 jan 4, 2026 — feb 2, 2026 impressions: 1,459 product page views: 84 downloads: 11 in-app purchases: 0 revenue: US$0 active devices: 1 deletions: 2 my best guess That's a wake-up call. I think it's safe to say this project is officially a failure. Pricing, features, design — I could list a hundred things that went wrong, but if no one's sticking around to use the app, there's not much else to explain. It's my first app, so I'm attached to it, and it was something I genuinely needed — but if the market says no, then as a product, it failed. Can't argue with that. I thought maybe there'd be other obsessive text-block collectors out there who'd want something like this....

day 266: still 4.24 out of 99

It's been 22 days since I set those targets. Quick check-in. App revenue is still $4.24. Same number, same two apps behind it. Requote is subscription-based, so downloads don't move the number unless someone converts — a few people downloaded it, none subscribed. Sumof is paid upfront, so no downloads means no revenue, and there were no downloads. Two different shapes of nothing, adding up to the same $4.24. YouTube went faster than I expected. Watch time went from 100 hours to 220. Subscribers went from 15 to 25. Back on March 30th I did the math and figured I might add another 200 hours by December — at this pace I'd pass that, which would be nice, but I've been doing this long enough to know these things don't move in straight lines. 10 new subscribers in 22 days is a lot for me. Thank you. Books: 27 to 30. I was away for about ten days between the move and a trip, so I didn't read much. 50 by June 30th is still on the table. And sumof. I wanted to log all my...

2 months of youtube: the numbers nobody asked for

dec 5, 2025 — jan 3, 2026 views: 375 watch hours: 0.7 subscribers: 1 average view duration: 0:27 impressions: 3,078 average click-through rate: 0.7% top 3 in views -  Expectation: Holiday Productivity / Reality: This #Shorts -  Reading About Productivity Instead of Being Productive | Read with me (No Music) -  Consistency Remains Incomprehensible to Me | Work with me (No Music) top 3 in watch hours -  Expectation: Holiday Productivity / Reality: This #Shorts -  Choosing the New Switches Over the To-Do List | Read with me (No Music) -  Consistency Remains Incomprehensible to Me | Work with me (No Music) top 3 in avg. view duration -  Choosing the New Switches Over the To-Do List | Read with me (No Music) -  Didn’t Even Reach the First Chapter | Read with me (No Music) -  Consistency Remains Incomprehensible to Me | Work with me (No Music) top 3 in CTR -  Consistency Remains Incomprehensible to Me | Work with me (No Music) -  Reading ...